The Senior Dogs Project "Blessed is the person who has earned the love of an old dog."

..........."Looking Out for Older Dogs" ...........
- Sydney Jeanne Seward
| News.... December 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issues & Announcements |
|
|
Vaccinations and Veterinary Ethics
|
|
|
We were dismayed and disheartened to read a news release dated 11/14/02, that bore the headline: Over-Vaccination Alert: Protect Your Pet From Your Vet? The opening sentence read: "Millions of dogs and cats may face the risk of deadly immune system disorders, cancer and other serious side effects, because veterinarians profit from often unnecessary annual rabies shots." The release cites statistics developed by Jim Schwartz of suburban Denver, CO, who is the founder of Next-To-Kin Foundation (see www.next2kin.org), and who also lost a dog, "Moolah," to autoimmune disease after receiving an annual rabies vaccination. In doing extensive research, Schwartz discovered a United Kingdom study showing that one in ten dogs and cats suffer side effects from rabies vaccinations. And distressingly to the point, however, is Schwartz's computation showing that a mark-up of 11,000% is applied to rabies vaccinations. A shot costs the veterinarian about 61 cents. Typically, a veterinarian will charge $35 for an office visit and $38 for the shot. Schwartz says, "The fact is that for many small-pet dominant veterinary practices, the shots are critical to their economic wherewithal."
In addition to the spotlight that Schwartz's work is focusing on this issue, a Texas veterinarian, Dr. Bob Rogers, has filed a complaint with the Attorney General of Texas and the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners against his colleagues for their over-vaccination practices. "Every year the people of Texas spend $360 million on unnecessary and potentially harmful vaccinations for their pets," he writes. He states further, "Charging for vaccines that have no benefit and are potentially harmful is theft by deception and cruelty to animals." Schwartz has formed the Next-To-Kin(SM) Foundation to advocate for dogs, cats and their owners. Next-To-Kin's mission is to extend and enhance the quality of life of traditional companion animals by preventing unnecessary death, illness and suffering. In addition to eliminating over-vaccination, the foundation seeks to be a voice in support of legal efforts to recognize that dogs and cats have value beyond that of mere property. "Dogs and cats have moved from the backyard to the bedroom," says Schwartz, explaining that companion animals have become increasingly important to their humans; their value exceeds that of mere property. Next-To-Kin is providing people who become members of the foundation with a Vaccination Alert Consent Form. The form documents that the veterinarian has discussed vaccination issues -- such as shot frequency, benefits and risks -- and appropriate alternatives with the owner. "This form empowers guardians to take charge of their companion-animal's well-being," says Schwartz. "Next-To-Kin is trying to encourage that kind of dialog between guardians and vets." For information on the Next-To-Kin Foundation, its mission and over-vaccination issues, visit the foundation's website, www.next2kin.org; call (303) 850-9166; e-mail info@next2kin.org; or write to Next-To-Kin Foundation, 8547 East Arapahoe Road, J197, Greenwood Village, CO 80112-1430. |
|
|
Corrections to Our Report on Veterinary Pet Insurance; Apologies and a Memorial Tribute to World Trade Center Hero "Bear" |
|
|
In our August newsletter, we applauded Veterinary Pet Insurance (VPI) for reversing their original decision not to provide insurance for Bear, the 12-year-old Golden Retriever who risked his life and health to locate people trapped in the rubble of the World Trade Center after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Captain Scott Shields, Bear's human handler, tells us that he refused lifetime insurance for Bear until VPI promised to cover all the other search-and-rescue dogs. Apparently, according to Captain Shields, this promise was not fulfilled, and VPI offered policies only to 79 of the more-than-300 teams that worked the site. The other teams were never informed about the insurance. Those dogs and handlers would have given their lives, Captain Shields points out, and it seems highly inappropriate that they were denied such information. Bear died on September 23, 2002, as a result of his work at Ground Zero. He was given a funeral service as a New York City Fireman. Bear was first on the World Trade Center site and made the only live finds by a dog. He also made the most finds of any man or dog, and he found beloved N.Y. Fire Chief Peter Ganci. We apologize for our error in posting an incorrect photograph of Captain Shields and Bear. It was our fault for not checking its accuracy. For an accurate photo of Bear and other information on Bear's heroic role at the World Trade Center site, please visit the In Honor of Bear site. |
|
|
PROHEART 6 WARNING CONTINUES!! ....Important to report suspected adverse effects to Fort Dodge and to the FDA....
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
To date, we have had reports that there are seven dogs whose deaths are suspected to be linked to administration of ProHeart6. A potential lawsuit against Fort Dodge, the drug's manufacturer, is being investigated with representation in the states of Colorado, North Carolina, Alabama, and Texas. Other dogs have also been identified who are ill or are displaying some of the symptoms listed as potential side effects of ProHeart6 by Fort Dodge. If you suspect your dog has had an adverse reaction to ProHeart6, notify your veterinarian. By law, your veterinarian must report such an incident to the drug's manufacturer, Fort Dodge. In turn, Fort Dodge is required to report adverse events to the Center for Veterinary Medicine of the FDA. In reality, this does not always happen as required, and it is necessary for a client to follow up personally with the manufacturer and the FDA. For more information on doing such follow-up, contact Janice Story, E-mail: jstorey1@swbell.net
|
|
|
Rimadyl's Side Effects....Pfizer Does Not Sponsor the srdogs Site! |
|
| We were startled by a recent E-mail in which we were asked whether the srdogs site was sponsored by Pfizer, the makers of Rimadyl. We realized that, in our efforts to present a balanced view of the drug, it seems the reports we've posted about the benefits of Rimadyl have taken a more prominent position on the site, even though they are far outnumbered by the reports of fatalities and other adverse side effects linked to the drug. We don't post all reports that we continue to receive, but thought the following one provided focus, once again, on two issues: (1) Rimadyl has potential serious side effects; (2) Not all vets are aware of them. | |
|
Dalmatian Taking Rimadyl Has Kidney Failure; Vets Not Aware of Rimadyl's Effects on Kidneys and Advise Euthanasia; Dog Recovers after Rimadyl Is Withdrawn and Therapy Started From name withheld: "My dog, Petey is a Dalmation mix who is about 12 years old. He was a stray we rescued when he was about a year old. In June 2001, he started to have problems getting up and x-rays showed he had a compressed disc in his lower back. The vet put him on Rimadyl. He did improve, 'though not a great deal. But his pain seemed to be less. In April or May this year he started vomiting and refused food and water. I took him right to the vet and they speculated on a number of possible causes. Since he was amazingly heathly until this time, I questioned the Rimadyl. I was assured that it couldn't be the cause. After about $800, they determined that he had a severe kidney infection and put him on antibiotics. They did IV fluid therapy and they some anti-nausea drugs. He got a little better over the next few weeks. Then, he took a turn for the worse. After another round of tests and about $700, they told me he was near renal failure. They said, based on his kidney numbers, he would have only about 25% kidney function. Again, I asked about Rimadyl and three different vets in the practice told me that Rimadyl is only known to cause liver damager. They encouraged me to continue to give it to him. I did. He would feel better with fluid therapy and try to eat, then get sick again. Finally, in July he got very sick and nothing they did helped. He was hospitalized for a week and vomited every day. He lost six pounds. They suggested my only option was to put him to sleep. I brought him home. I took him off Rimadyl. I gave him sub-q fluids and cooked chicken for him. I continued the Pepcid and Alternagel. Little by little he got better. He had a test in September that was close to normal. Now, I began to suspect Rimadyl. I talked with two other people who had older dogs, who mentioned they had to put their dog to sleep recently. During the conversation, they each said their dog had been taking Rimadyl. Neither suspected it might have caused the problem. I got on the Internet and searched for Rimadly. Right on Pfizer's site they say Rimdayl can caused kidney damage and dogs with kidney problems should not take it. I printed out that information and paid my vet a visit. I spoke with two of the three vets who told me Rimadyl was safe. They were shocked to learn this information. They said they only get information about drug testing that happens prior to the release, but nothing about what happens after dogs start taking the drug. I have since seen the package insert and the information is clearly on there. At any rate, they called Pfizer, and the vets there were very careful not to admit too much. They said that, certainly, Petey should not have been given Rimadyl after his kidney function was impaired, and, yes, in rare cases it can cause kidney problems. They also said there is no way to tell if Rimadyl caused the problem or not. They said they'd have to do extensive testing where they sacrificed many dogs in order to see if Rimadyl was a problem. This is all information relayed to me by my vet. At this point, Petey's numbers are back up, but not as high as they were in July. He's eating some, but not real well. I'm just trying to learn more about how to help him." |
|
|
Rescue & Adoption Notes |
|
|
Cody and Dalton Living Happily Ever After
|
|
![]() |
Update on Cody and Dalton:
"We adopted Cody and Dalton (two Springer Spaniels) in March of 2000, after seeing them on your site. We still have both of them and they are doing well. Cody's health has begun to decline, but with excellent care from our vet, we are hoping he will be with us for a while longer. Dalton is still in fairly good health for a 12 1/2-year-old dog. Thank you for being part of bringing them to our family. Best regards, Betty Dingman" |
|
Iowa City Animal Care and Adoption Center |
|
| We were delighted to hear about the good work being done at the Iowa City Animal Care and Adoption Center. Here are excerpts from an E-mail message we received:
"The Iowa City Animal Care and Adoption Center is a city -funded shelter where we try to place the animals who overflow the capacity of the Center with rescue organizations. The Center's Director, Misha Goodman, is wonderful, and the animals here are treated very well. They have medical treatment, grooming and many go to obedience school. The dogs are given two scenic walks a day along the Iowa River by loyal volunteers, indoor kennels with beds and toys, large outdoor kennels, too, on a daily basis, as well as play time with other dogs. Unfortunately, we reach capacity and are a low-kill facility, doing everything we can to place dogs into new homes and failing that, with rescue organizations. We have dogs of all breeds; many appear to be purebred and may appeal to people looking for a particular type of dog, and often many senior dogs looking for a loving friend. We have a great website that shows pictures, stats of each dog, and even some movies of them." |
|
|
Testimonials |
|
|
Two Senior Bassets Make a Great Addition to the Family
"Two years ago I adopted two senior Basset Hounds. I received some criticism for adopting these older dogs. Everyone told me that they could have habits from their former family that we would hate, and you could never change that. "I have never looked back. They are the two greatest dogs! It was the best decision I ever made. They eased into the house rules easily and without much of a fight. They became extremely attached to the whole family. "They are great with the children, even though they previously had not been around kids much. Another bonus was I didn't have to go through the hassle of house-breaking them." brianeb@telus.net |
|
|
The Joy of Senior Dogs
|
|